<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My new Mac</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.jameslin.name/2009/03/24/my-new-mac/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.jameslin.name/2009/03/24/my-new-mac/</link>
	<description>Jimmy Lin&#039;s blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2011 18:55:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyrone</title>
		<link>http://blog.jameslin.name/2009/03/24/my-new-mac/comment-page-1/#comment-985</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyrone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 21:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jameslin.name/?p=331#comment-985</guid>
		<description>OSX word processors - I&#039;ve used most of the 3rd party offerings quite extensively, and I&#039;m still not sure which one is the best.  Here&#039;s my take:

Office 2008 for Mac - it&#039;s quite polished and I actually like the UI better than in Windows.  It&#039;s all just more jazzed up visually, including the weird icons.  Cons - expensive, and doesn&#039;t read the .odt format (an obvious dealbreaker for me, considering where I work).  Sun has released an .odt converter for Office, but it&#039;s (so far) only for Windows.  

StarOffice 9/ OpenOffice 3.0 - in theory, these should be the best, with the nicest UI outside of MS (and arguably nicer, if you&#039;re nostalgic for the pre-2007 Office before all the changes), along with full features and .odt support.  There&#039;s even a docx converter now (which works decently well on most documents, except for ones with heavy formatting).  That being said, I&#039;ve run into this terrible crippling error on both of them, which basically freezes the program after a while, especially for longer documents, or ones converted from .doc.  It&#039;s maddening, and it&#039;s forced me to go back to NeoOffice.  The good news is, I was on the phone with StarOffice project manager yesterday about an unrelated matter, and took the time to vent about this freezing problem.  He&#039;s going to look into the issue personally (I&#039;m supposed to send him examples of documents that crash the program), and they&#039;ll try to fix it right away.  Here&#039;s hoping...

NeoOffice - it&#039;s slow and clunky compared to the others, but like your old faithful mule, it has the benefit of (almost) always working.  I hate the ship icon.  I&#039;ve deleted it numerous times, only to have to reinstall it after StarOffice or OO fail me again.  It&#039;s like Olan in The Good Earth.  There was a new &quot;major update&quot; a few weeks ago, which as far as I could tell, changed absolutely nothing.  It sometimes has problems converting more heavily formatted.docs, and Excel spreadsheets as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OSX word processors &#8211; I&#8217;ve used most of the 3rd party offerings quite extensively, and I&#8217;m still not sure which one is the best.  Here&#8217;s my take:</p>
<p>Office 2008 for Mac &#8211; it&#8217;s quite polished and I actually like the UI better than in Windows.  It&#8217;s all just more jazzed up visually, including the weird icons.  Cons &#8211; expensive, and doesn&#8217;t read the .odt format (an obvious dealbreaker for me, considering where I work).  Sun has released an .odt converter for Office, but it&#8217;s (so far) only for Windows.  </p>
<p>StarOffice 9/ OpenOffice 3.0 &#8211; in theory, these should be the best, with the nicest UI outside of MS (and arguably nicer, if you&#8217;re nostalgic for the pre-2007 Office before all the changes), along with full features and .odt support.  There&#8217;s even a docx converter now (which works decently well on most documents, except for ones with heavy formatting).  That being said, I&#8217;ve run into this terrible crippling error on both of them, which basically freezes the program after a while, especially for longer documents, or ones converted from .doc.  It&#8217;s maddening, and it&#8217;s forced me to go back to NeoOffice.  The good news is, I was on the phone with StarOffice project manager yesterday about an unrelated matter, and took the time to vent about this freezing problem.  He&#8217;s going to look into the issue personally (I&#8217;m supposed to send him examples of documents that crash the program), and they&#8217;ll try to fix it right away.  Here&#8217;s hoping&#8230;</p>
<p>NeoOffice &#8211; it&#8217;s slow and clunky compared to the others, but like your old faithful mule, it has the benefit of (almost) always working.  I hate the ship icon.  I&#8217;ve deleted it numerous times, only to have to reinstall it after StarOffice or OO fail me again.  It&#8217;s like Olan in The Good Earth.  There was a new &#8220;major update&#8221; a few weeks ago, which as far as I could tell, changed absolutely nothing.  It sometimes has problems converting more heavily formatted.docs, and Excel spreadsheets as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://blog.jameslin.name/2009/03/24/my-new-mac/comment-page-1/#comment-974</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jameslin.name/?p=331#comment-974</guid>
		<description>Do NOT install Vista. It is horrid.  Install the Win7 RC1 or wait for the real one. It performs very well (I have it on 4 machines, including an Acer Aspire One netbook -- it runs fast even on that low-powered machine).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do NOT install Vista. It is horrid.  Install the Win7 RC1 or wait for the real one. It performs very well (I have it on 4 machines, including an Acer Aspire One netbook &#8212; it runs fast even on that low-powered machine).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy</title>
		<link>http://blog.jameslin.name/2009/03/24/my-new-mac/comment-page-1/#comment-973</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jameslin.name/?p=331#comment-973</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t buy Office 2008 because I already bought Office 2007 and didn&#039;t feel like shelling out that much more money. I have one friend who really likes iWork, and two other friends who don&#039;t use office suites at all, so we&#039;ll see how this goes. Of course, there&#039;s also &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.openoffice.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;OpenOffice&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.neooffice.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;NeoOffice&lt;/a&gt;, and even &lt;a href=&quot;http://symphony.lotus.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Lotus Symphony&lt;/a&gt;...

As far as blogging software goes: sometimes it&#039;s more convenient to use a local app, especially if you&#039;re offline. Basically, I&#039;m looking for a Mac equivalent of &lt;a href=&quot;http://download.live.com/writer&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Windows Live Writer&lt;/a&gt;, a straightforward, easy-to-use blogging tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t buy Office 2008 because I already bought Office 2007 and didn&#8217;t feel like shelling out that much more money. I have one friend who really likes iWork, and two other friends who don&#8217;t use office suites at all, so we&#8217;ll see how this goes. Of course, there&#8217;s also <a href="http://www.openoffice.org/" rel="nofollow">OpenOffice</a>, <a href="http://www.neooffice.org/" rel="nofollow">NeoOffice</a>, and even <a href="http://symphony.lotus.com/" rel="nofollow">Lotus Symphony</a>&#8230;</p>
<p>As far as blogging software goes: sometimes it&#8217;s more convenient to use a local app, especially if you&#8217;re offline. Basically, I&#8217;m looking for a Mac equivalent of <a href="http://download.live.com/writer" rel="nofollow">Windows Live Writer</a>, a straightforward, easy-to-use blogging tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carolyn</title>
		<link>http://blog.jameslin.name/2009/03/24/my-new-mac/comment-page-1/#comment-972</link>
		<dc:creator>Carolyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jameslin.name/?p=331#comment-972</guid>
		<description>Disclaimer: I was a diehard MSDOS-CP/M-Windoze person from 1980-2005 and went full-time Mac after. But...I use all the expensive programs like CS4, Office 2008, iWork/iLife, Parallels, etc.

So why not get Office 2008 for the Mac and forget Parallels? I personally would never rely on iWork exclusively. In fact, I only use Pages to make nicer-looking invoices and newsletters. (I do, however, use Keynote exclusively and find it a pain to export to PPT. Also have had presentation issues if something happens at the last minute and I can&#039;t connect my laptop.) If I didn&#039;t get iWork and iLife for $39 each (academic discount), probably would never bother with iWork.

The Preview app does some amazing basic image editing, too. And get Skitch! Awesome screen capture/editing app. (One more: Adium is a great all-in-one IM tool.)

And isn&#039;t all blogging &quot;software&quot; web-based, or am I missing something here? I use Blogger and WordPress, but all via the web.

Either way, have fun! And glad you escaped the Dark Side :) It&#039;s a lot more fun over here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disclaimer: I was a diehard MSDOS-CP/M-Windoze person from 1980-2005 and went full-time Mac after. But&#8230;I use all the expensive programs like CS4, Office 2008, iWork/iLife, Parallels, etc.</p>
<p>So why not get Office 2008 for the Mac and forget Parallels? I personally would never rely on iWork exclusively. In fact, I only use Pages to make nicer-looking invoices and newsletters. (I do, however, use Keynote exclusively and find it a pain to export to PPT. Also have had presentation issues if something happens at the last minute and I can&#8217;t connect my laptop.) If I didn&#8217;t get iWork and iLife for $39 each (academic discount), probably would never bother with iWork.</p>
<p>The Preview app does some amazing basic image editing, too. And get Skitch! Awesome screen capture/editing app. (One more: Adium is a great all-in-one IM tool.)</p>
<p>And isn&#8217;t all blogging &#8220;software&#8221; web-based, or am I missing something here? I use Blogger and WordPress, but all via the web.</p>
<p>Either way, have fun! And glad you escaped the Dark Side <img src='http://blog.jameslin.name/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  It&#8217;s a lot more fun over here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Azuma</title>
		<link>http://blog.jameslin.name/2009/03/24/my-new-mac/comment-page-1/#comment-971</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Azuma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 08:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jameslin.name/?p=331#comment-971</guid>
		<description>Oh, and speaking of installing unix-y stuff, MacPorts (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.macports.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.macports.org/&lt;/a&gt;) is a good package management system for the Mac.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and speaking of installing unix-y stuff, MacPorts (<a href="http://www.macports.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.macports.org/</a>) is a good package management system for the Mac.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Azuma</title>
		<link>http://blog.jameslin.name/2009/03/24/my-new-mac/comment-page-1/#comment-970</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Azuma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 08:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jameslin.name/?p=331#comment-970</guid>
		<description>The image utility of choice on the Mac is GraphicConverter (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lemkesoft.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.lemkesoft.com/&lt;/a&gt;). It is one of the oldest and most respected Mac applications still in active development, and it&#039;s maxxed out the rating scale on pretty much every major review. Opens and converts every format on the planet (and a few that were probably from other planets), does batches, and includes a solid set of image editing tools. $35 shareware and a steal at that price. 

Also remember that you&#039;re running a BSD derivative, and you therefore have access to a wide variety of free unix tools, from the Gimp to ImageMagick. X11 programs are a little clumsier to run than native Aqua applications, but it is an alternative, especially if you want to script them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The image utility of choice on the Mac is GraphicConverter (<a href="http://www.lemkesoft.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.lemkesoft.com/</a>). It is one of the oldest and most respected Mac applications still in active development, and it&#8217;s maxxed out the rating scale on pretty much every major review. Opens and converts every format on the planet (and a few that were probably from other planets), does batches, and includes a solid set of image editing tools. $35 shareware and a steal at that price. </p>
<p>Also remember that you&#8217;re running a BSD derivative, and you therefore have access to a wide variety of free unix tools, from the Gimp to ImageMagick. X11 programs are a little clumsier to run than native Aqua applications, but it is an alternative, especially if you want to script them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

